vitalsign0 wrote:

That's the problem with whattodozel's doctor. He is great at emailing before the surgery when he is trying to sell you on the idea of getting one. Basically stating a vitrectomy is no big deal and he hasn't had any major complications in 20 years. Then a patient, zel in this case, loses his vision in the operated eye and it is now a challenge to get a hold of him on the phone or email. When contact is made very little information is given and the whole situation is dismissed. 


Sadly I'm starting to agree with this assessment. I think it's great that he's so willing to perform FOV. But he does seem overly dismissive of the risks.