ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Posts: 137
May 10 14 8:27 PM
Posts: 308
May 11 14 3:55 AM
alexwest wrote:wink0514, Why is whattodozel doctor out of the question? I would think that the doctor learned from this mistake as not to repeat it in the future. I'm going to go with his doctor personally and I've already emailed him.
Posts: 21
May 11 14 7:16 PM
vitalsign0 wrote: That's the problem with whattodozel's doctor. He is great at emailing before the surgery when he is trying to sell you on the idea of getting one. Basically stating a vitrectomy is no big deal and he hasn't had any major complications in 20 years. Then a patient, zel in this case, loses his vision in the operated eye and it is now a challenge to get a hold of him on the phone or email. When contact is made very little information is given and the whole situation is dismissed.
Posts: 38
May 11 14 8:54 PM
GenericUsername wrote:vitalsign0 wrote: That's the problem with whattodozel's doctor. He is great at emailing before the surgery when he is trying to sell you on the idea of getting one. Basically stating a vitrectomy is no big deal and he hasn't had any major complications in 20 years. Then a patient, zel in this case, loses his vision in the operated eye and it is now a challenge to get a hold of him on the phone or email. When contact is made very little information is given and the whole situation is dismissed. Sadly I'm starting to agree with this assessment. I think it's great that he's so willing to perform FOV. But he does seem overly dismissive of the risks.
Posts: 41
May 11 14 9:19 PM
Posts: 299
May 12 14 8:56 AM
Posts: 96
May 12 14 3:23 PM
Posts: 4
May 12 14 6:06 PM
May 17 14 8:57 PM
May 17 14 9:30 PM
May 21 14 9:35 PM
Posts: 145
May 22 14 4:00 PM
Posts: 25
May 27 14 5:50 AM
Jun 13 14 3:43 AM